You're not alone!I miss the days when there wasn't a lot of money in football, 3 o'clock kick offs, terraces and you didn't really talk about players wages etc, but then again I'm an old git.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The post lacks substantial content and context for meaningful discussion, offering only a link without engagement or personal insights.
The discussion kicked off with revelations that Manchester City was found guilty of almost all financial misconduct charges from 2009 to 2018. Many posts emphasized the potential repercussions, with users debating the magnitude of this scandal, calling it possibly the biggest in sports history.12
As the discussion progressed, some users speculated on the possible punishments, ranging from hefty fines to severe points deductions. Reactions were polarized; while many demanded harsh sanctions, others expressed skepticism regarding the fairness of the proceedings and potential appeals by the club.34
Toward the end, the mood remained intense, with ongoing concerns about whether City would actually accept the ruling or pursue legal avenues. The sheer scale of the allegations and the reaction from various football officials continued to dominate conversations, reinforcing a sense of uncertainty surrounding the club's future in the league.56
"I wouldn't feel comfortable about accepting another Premier League medal..."
"Abu Dhabi state airline Etihad Airways... considering taking legal action..."
The forum seems deeply divided on whether Manchester City deserves severe punishment for their actions. While there is a strong sentiment for accountability, unanswered questions remain regarding the club's appeal and the final outcomes.
You're not alone!I miss the days when there wasn't a lot of money in football, 3 o'clock kick offs, terraces and you didn't really talk about players wages etc, but then again I'm an old git.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2108192105575456949
Expulsion is decided by the other clubs.I see a lot of people saying other owners don't want City expelled from the league. Is that how it actually works? Surely the punishment is not decided by other clubs?
Maresca is towing the party line in his press conference and is of the belief that they will win the appeal. Also believes that the titles are not tainted.
Manchester City manager Enzo Maresca has said the club's titles are "absolutely not" tainted after the Premier League found them guilty of the majority of the 115 charges brought against them.
Maresca said he has complete trust in the club's owners and believes City will win their appeal against the verdict, which was announced by an independent commission.
The club were found guilty of all charges relating to breaches of the Premier League's financial regulations between the 2009-10 and 2017-18 seasons. City have appealed and said the commission's ruling contained "clear material errors, of law, principle and fact and is unsafe".
Speaking at a news conference on Friday, Maresca said: "The reason I joined this club is that I completely trust, 100%, the owner, the CEO, the sporting director, all the organisation. So I don't have doubt about that.
"I spoke with the club for sure. We all trust, and probably the right moment to speak about that is when we are going to win this appeal."
He added: "For me, the players - we can control just the pitch side, the football side. So we are focused on that. This is what we can do and what we can control."
City are preparing for their first match since the verdict, away to Liverpool on Sunday. Maresca said in an in-house interview on Thursday that the "feeling is fantastic" among his players and they are not affected by "the noise" around the club.
The Italian said the atmosphere at Anfield would make the match more difficult, adding: "It will be a tough game, for sure. We need to be ready, the focus needs to be about the game, but we know the environment at Anfield.
"It probably will be worse because of the situation but, again, it will be our duty to do our best and try to win the game."
Maresca, who was appointed as Pep Guardiola's successor in June, is in his third spell at the club after time spent with the academy and as Guardiola's assistant coach, including during the Treble-winning 2022-23 campaign.
He has won each of his first five Premier League games in charge and could become the fourth manager to win his first six league matches in charge of a club if City beat Liverpool.
Maresca would not say whether he had read the independent commission's findings. He said the charges were not discussed during talks over his appointment and insisted he would "100%" still have taken the job if the findings had been published earlier.
He also confirmed Erling Haaland is "ready" to play against Liverpool after recovering from his efforts for Norway during the international break in Marbella.
Earlier on Friday, Bayern Munich manager and former Manchester City captain Vincent Kompany said: "I played 11 years for the club and I've loved all the years I've played for the club. Everything we've achieved and done on the pitch I'm really proud of.
"Everything else, as a player you're not a part of that. Right now, as a coach of Bayern Munich, I'm not too occupied with that topic."
From the Premier League.Could someone better informed than me please tell me what exactly an 'Independent Premier League Commission ' is, independent of what?
Manchester City FC has appealed the decision of an independent Commission regarding breaches of Premier League rules.
The club lodged the appeal to the Chair of the Judicial Panel.
The independent Appeal Board hearing will remain private and confidential until publication of the outcome is permitted.
Notes
Premier League investigations, independent Commissions, and Appeal Boards
- The Premier League Board has the power to investigate any suspected or alleged breach of Premier League Rules.
- Where, following the conclusion of an investigation or otherwise, the Board believes that there is a suspicion or allegation of a Rule breach, it has a number of options available to it. One of these options is to issue a written complaint and refer the matter to a Commission.
- The League has established an independent Judicial Panel, comprising a number of legal, financial and other experts.
- Members of the Judicial Panel are appointed by its independent Chair. It is also the Chair of the Judicial Panel who selects members of the Judicial Panel to sit on Commissions, which are independent of the Premier League. The Chair of the Judicial Panel at the time of the Complaint in these proceedings was Murray Rosen KC. The current Chair of the Judicial Panel is Sir Gary Hickinbottom.
- All proceedings convened under Section W of the Rules are confidential and heard in private.
- The Commission appointed under Section W of the Rules has a broad discretion as to the sanctions it wishes to apply, the non-exhaustive list set out in rules includes fines, points deductions and other sporting sanctions.
- Whenever a Commission makes what is described as a 'final award' in the rules, such decisions are published on the Premier League website.
- A party to proceedings that wishes to challenge a decision of the Commission may do so under Section W of the Premier League Rules, by filing an appeal to be heard before an Appeal Board.
- Appeal Boards are also appointed by the Chair of the Judicial Panel and must have three members, one of whom should have held judicial office, and would sit as the chair of the Appeal Board.
- An Appeal Board has wide discretion in respect of the appeal, and may allow it, dismiss it, or make any other order that it thinks fit (including varying the order of Commission).
For further information on the disciplinary process, please see Section W of the Premier League Handbook.